Dr. Orly Taitz - A raft of subpoenas
Dr. Orly Taitz reports
Dr. Orly sent out many subpoenas in the last day or so, associated with Bush’s executive order on Friday afternoon:
UPDATE
The subpoenas, in pdf format, can be reviewed at these links:
For example, the subpoena sent to the FBI is:
An attachment included was
Attachment 3
As per Executive Order: Granting Reciprocity on Excepted Service and Federal Contractor Employee Fitness and Reinvestigating Individuals in Positions of Public Trust, see attached, please provide copies of any and all records in regards to level of character and conduct necessary pertaining to Barack H. Obama, a/k/a Barack H. Obama, II a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro. These documents have direct relation to holding a Position of Public Trust.
Documents to include:
- Certified copy of original long vault birth certificate
- Certified copies of any and all passports and passport applications held in the U.S., Indonesia, Great Britain and Kenya.
- Certified copies of any and all school applications, school registrations, grant or student loan applications or funding received for Occidental College, Columbia University, Columbia College, Harvard University
- Certified copies of any U.S. Port of Entry Records
- Certified copies of any documentation pertaining to Social Security. Documentation showing multiple social security numbers being held
- Certified copies of documentation showing a social security number being applied for in the state of Connecticut
- Certified copies of immigration and naturalization records
Certified copies of any records showing legal name and name change
Orly also sent subpoenas to the Social Security Administration, Department of Education, Department of State, Department of Defense, CIA, Office of Personnel Management, Department of the Interior, IRS, Department of Health and Human Services, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Secret Service.
Well, guess they are moot since Bush’s exec. order didn’t go into effect.
why does TAITZ no longer show up on a search of SCOTUS http://www.supremecourtus.gov
in search dockets
when it used to be there
and Berg is still there?
is TAITZ a spy-counter-spy for Obama?
Karen, how did you find out it did not go into effect?
‘dandelions tell no lies’
Dear dandeloinstellnolies, no Dr. Orly Taitz is a Patriot who gives everything for the struggle for the Constitution. Fact of the matter is that there is a dirty game going at SCOTUS.
Read: Obama has been in power only one day and they are already playing games with the Supreme Court
My best guess is the above document is bogus and that no attorney can file anything like that with no telephone number for the attorney listed.
I am beginning to think this Taitz person is a total fraud or spy-counter-spy.
Careful scrutiny of everything Taitz files shows it is intended to not hold up in court, right?
Like that “bogus” filing in CA where she failed to file to the only person who counted, the U.S. Attorney General who is the only one in real control and ENFORCEMENT (8 USCS Section 1103), of immigration & naturalization, where as the Secretary of State only has mere ADMINISTRATIVE (8 USCS Section 1104) control, so Taitz did not file to the one person with real control.
I doubt highly whether any FEDERAL AGENCY or court would file the above document without a telephone number.
I wish we could discuss here, quite realistically, if this Taitz character is or is not totally out-to-lunch!
Well I certainly don’t agree with your point of view in, fact I begin to question your motivations in particular as implicitly you are attemting to shift the blame for the “mysterious” removal of Dr. Orly’s case from the docket away from the Usurper.
Without wanting to accuse I notice that your timing seems pretty convenient for the Usurper’s Mafia. Manipulation and deception are typical for Barry Soetoro culties.
Dandelion-
You seem to know a lot about the Federal gov’t. Since you know so much about it, why don’t you try to file and get the Usurper to show his BC. Dr.Orly have done more for this country than the Usurper in the W.H. You are obviously just another Obot. You voted and doted for someone who has done nothing except for voting present.
Please tell me why you voted for Obama? Have you seen his BC? Do you know anything about Obama? Lets discuss.
What the ?????? Orly issued subpoenas in a case that was rejected by the California Supreme Court, to agencies that are beyond the subpoena power of a California state? Y’all need to hit that “Donate” button real fast, cause Orly’s going to be taking up a collection to pay sanctions when the Motions to Quash are granted vis-a-vis these illegal subpoenas. What can she possibly be thinking? Anyone care to hazard a guess?
uhhh…Something is very wrong here. The Donofrio and WROTNOWSKI cases have been removed from the SCOTUS docket too. Something truly treacherous is going on here.
Everything is still on course. Continue as planned.
I do agree with David Crockett. This person came on the scene just now in hopes that we will think Dr. Ortiz is a phony like Obama. Well we have more faith in Ortiz then we ever will in Obama. He is a fraud, Liar and a ursurper. He is not a presient. He is a person that has not proven himself to be honorable and document his BC and other papers. He had his men run to Alaska to vet Sarah Palin but no one has vetted him and he and his wife say no one will they will not let it happen. They said they are above the law when speaking at the Jerimiah Writghts Church. So go win Dr. Ortiz you are the best
The files I looked at has her phone number on each of them. It is next to her name and is a California area code. so Dandelion you are wilted. And pulled up.
Take the test.
FIRST QUESTION: Who IS the actual and lawful 44th President of the USA?
ANSWER: Joe Biden
Biden was initially the Acting President for at least 5 minutes under either the Constitution’s Article 2 or the Constitution’s 20th Amendment, from 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, having already taken his Oath of Office and before Obama completed his ‘oath’ at approximately 12:05 PM, 1/20/09. Under the 20th Amendment if the President-elect shall have failed to qualify, or alternatively under Article 2 if the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term, being 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, which ability and/or qualification includes that he take the Article 2 oath “before he enter on the execution of his office,” then either the Presidency shall devolve on the Vice President under Article 2 or the Vice President shall act as President under the 20th Amendment. (The importance of the oath in ‘commencing’ an ‘Obama Presidency’ — rather than merely the 1/20/09 Noon time — is confirmed by the re-take of the ‘oath’ by Obama at the White House on 1/21/09 after the first ‘oath’ was NOT administered by Justice Roberts NOR recited by Obama in the words as required under Article 2.)
This is significant because at such time that the Supreme Court finally rules on the merits on Obama’s disqualification as not being an Article 2 “natural born citizen” (clearly he is NOT), Biden’s automatic status (without needing to take a separate Presidential Oath) of being President would be predicated upon four different bases: First, having been Vice President under Article 2; second, having been Vice President-elect under the 20th Amendment; third, having been actual President in the hiatus before Obama took the ‘oath(s)’; and fourth, retroactively deemed President during the full period of the Obama usurpation so that the acts of the Federal Government under the usurpation can be deemed authorized and/or ratified by Biden’s legitimacy.
SECOND QUESTION: Who will be the 45th President?
ANSWER: Hillary Clinton
One must assume that Bill and Hillary Clinton have been aware of all of the above. Biden’s wife recently “let the cat out of the bag” on the Oprah Show that both Biden and Hillary had considered alternatively Veep or Secretary of State, in either case, setting up Hillary to be President on a vote of the Democratic Congress if need be.
THIRD QUESTION: Is Obama an unwitting victim of this troika or a knowing participant?
ANSWER: Yet undetermined.
Ted-
I concur with you. That’s my thought all along especially when 3/4 of Obama’s administration used to be Clinton’s. Remember when that special visit that Obama made to Clinton’s office during the election? Obama was seeking advice or reporting to his boss?
Ted, Assuming the “troika” is actually real and the congress tries to vote in Hillary…
1. Could the Republicans filibuster and block her nomination…or…
2. Could it happen as she was not nominated by the people? Would it be legal? I don’t know this… Anyone?
Or would they even BE in office after BHO is found to be a fraud? Won’t they go down with him as well?
Wouldn’t that put an end to their legislative powers since they are in on this scheme to defraud the American public?
I think there are some “rules” that lawyers have to go by but I’m not lawyer but I think they do. Note following:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
V. DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY > Rule 26. Prev | NextRule 26. Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery
(d) Timing and Sequence of Discovery.
(1) Timing.
A party may not seek discovery from any source before the parties have conferred as required by Rule 26(f), except in a proceeding exempted from initial disclosure under Rule 26(a)(1)(B), or when authorized by these rules, by stipulation, or by court order.
One thing for sure, Queen Pelosi would be dethroned since she was the one that signed the election paper vouching for Obama’s qualification. Next would be the DNC for aiding and abetting the fraud.
As for voting in Hillary, GOP so far have shown that they do not have any backbones. They disagreed with Hillary appointment to the State job but did not do anything. They have been contacted about the Usurper and did not stand up nor question his qualifications to be POTUS. Not one of the Republicans in office did anything to deter the Constitution crisis. They went along with the bailout, fleecing America. They are just like McCain, I call all GOP RINO…REPUBLICAN IN NAME ONLY!!! It is a sad day in America when citizens have no representation.
“The Donofrio and WROTNOWSKI cases have been removed from the SCOTUS docket too.”
I would think SCOTUS would remove the Donfrio and Wrotnowski cases from the docket as both of them have been denied/dismissed.
IS THERE ANY HOPE OF THIS FRAUD GOING DOWN i AM STARTING TO LOSE CONFIDENCE THAT ANYTHING WILL HAPPEN TO THIS TRATOR