Scam Alert: Analysis on Hawaii HB1116; To what lengths will Obama and his accomplices in Hawaii go to cover up the fraud perpetrated by Obama…
I see some weasel word “cop-outs” for the Hawaii Health Dept as to what they will provide for the $100 fee in the wording of that proposed new law, HB1116. I see a bait and switch law in process in that one will not get what is really desired via this proposed new law. I don’t see anything in the words that say the $100 fee would entitle the applicant to get a certified true and correct copy of the original, typed long-form contemporaneous birth certificate from the 1961 birthing facility or the 1961 birth registration document if done by a member of the family. As I read that proposed HB1116 law it would simply allow an applicant for the payment of $100 to get a so called copy of the “birth certificate” of the “person of civic prominence” which in the eyes of the Hawaii Health Department would simply mean the applicant would get a computer generated copy of the “Certificate of Live Birth” which is merely a renamed and slightly enhanced version of the “Certification of Live Birth” that were issued prior to Hawaii changing the law at the end of 2008. So people in the general public could now order a Certificate of Live Birth (aka Birth Certificate) for a person of civic prominence instead of just people with a “tangible interest”. I do not read in that law the granting of powers to allow the public to get certified true and correct copies of the original birth registration documents and any amendments to the birth vital records file, if any.
Further contacts and inquiries to the Hawaiian legislators proposing this new law needs to be made to clarify exactly what type document they consider a “birth certificate” under this new law … copy of the original long form or a computer generated newly developed “Certificate of Live Birth” printed out off the birth registration database by a computer. If that is the case we once again will be dealing with the Garbage in Garbage Out (GIGO) type document that is not a copy of a contemporaneously generated 1961 document with signatures and names of witnesses to a birth.
I see in this proposed law just another “placebo” and diversionary law in the works to make it look like Hawaii is going to give the millions of people what they want to see … copies of the original, typed long-form birth registration records to see who filed them and what they contain, and any amendments made to those records since the original registration was filed. To what lengths will Obama and his accomplices in Hawaii go to cover up the fraud perpetrated by Obama and his enablers as to Obama’s true legal identity in the 2008 presidential election. See here for more on what likely happened in 1961 in regards to Obama’s birth being registered as occurring in Hawaii when he likely was not born there.
CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
FLASHBACK: - Hawaiian Law Demands Obama’s records be made public - Hawaii officials are breaking Hawaii law in not disclosing how they came to the public declarations made on October 31st, 2008 and July 27th, 2009. The hole Hawaiian officials had dug themselves with these declarations is deep, and there is no legal ladder out, other than to make public the resources and information they used in order to come to their conclusions. -Details here.
- Barack Obama and State of Hawaii on the ropes - According to law, the State of Hawaii must now disclose how it came to the decision that is found in Director Fukino’s July 27th Press Release that was approved by the State’s Attorney General. Haw. Rev. Stat. 28-4 states very clearly that formal opinions of the Attorney General must be made public. Further, the Hawaiian Office of Information Practices in 1991 formally set out the requirements that informal opinions of the AG must also be made available for public inspection. According to Donofrio, under the Uniform Rules of Evidence (Rule 510): “when the conclusions of an informal Attorney General opinion are made public by the agency/client, then the accompanying record of that opinion must also be disclosed to the public:” -Full report here.
- HI Director of Department of Health Perjures Herself before HI Senate Committee - STATEMENTS SEEN AS ATTEMPT TO DEFEND HERSELF AND DEPARTMENT FROM INQUIRIES REGARDING CONFLICTING PUBLIC STATEMENTS ON OBAMA’S VITAL RECORDS. -Details here.
- HI Department of Health Publicly rebuffs inquiries for Obama’s vital records - DOSSIER OF EXCUSES APPEARS ON WEB IN LAST 6 HOURS? -Details here.
- HI Department of Health refuses OIP’s request - THAT THEY DISCLOSE PUBLIC DOCUMENTS BY DEC. 21st. -Details here. -Complete archive of reports on the Hawaii DOH from the Post & Email can be viewed here.
- TerriK INVESTIGATION – PART 1: Hawaii Department of Health Directors(fmr) Fukino and Okubo Are Guilty of Misdirection -Details here.
TerriK INVESTIGATION, PART 2: OIP Staff Attorney Linden Joesting’s Response to TerriK’s Appeal Appears To Confirm That The DoH Maintains Amended Vital Records For pResident Obama. -Details here.
TerriK INVESTIGATION, Part 3: Hawaii AG Mark Bennett Approved Fukino’s Natural-Born Citizen Statement; All Records Should Be Made Public According To Law. -Details here.
- DoH Reverses Course – Releases Index Data For pResident Obama, Stanley Ann and Barack, Sr; No Records For Maya Exist. -Details here.
CONFIRMED: Hawaii Department of Health is Aiding and Abetting Obama’s Forged Certification of Live Birth, Got Final Nail in the Coffin!? -Details here.
ANOTHER MATTER: Democratic Party of Hawaii would not certify in 2008 that Obama was constitutionally and legally eligible for the Office of President. -Details here. Just like the DNC Certs.