Two popularly elected U.S. Senators were removed from office after it was learned they were NOT constitutionally eligible when elected.
A Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend the Constitution
Obama is NOT Article II constitutionally eligible to be the President and Commander of our military. Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen” to constitutional standards. Obama’s father was NOT a U.S. Citizen. Obama’s father was not an immigrant to the United States. Obama’s father was a foreign national, a British Subject. Obama is the child of an alien father who was sojourning in the U.S. attending college. Obama was born a British Subject via his father and is still such to this day. Obama has never conclusively proved he was born in Hawaii. Obama’s paternal family in Kenya, Kenyan government officials, and newspapers in Kenya say he was born in Kenya. Obama’s maternal grandmother likely falsely and illegally registered him as born in Hawaii to get him, her new foreign-born grandson, U.S. Citizenship.
History shows us that a popularly elected, but ineligible, chief executive in the executive branch of a government can be legally and constitutionally removed from office, e.g., Governor Thomas H. Moodie of North Dakota was a prime example. After he was sworn in and serving as Governor, the North Dakota State Supreme Court ordered Governor Moodie removed from office, after it was determined that he was constitutionally and legally ineligible to serve in the office to which he was popularly elected.
http://history.nd.gov/exhibits/governors/governors19.html
Also, two U.S. Senators although popularly elected and sworn in to the U.S. Senate were subsequently removed from office after it was learned that they were NOT constitutionally eligible when they were elected.
Albert Gallatin [U.S. Senator seating unconstitutional and annulled]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Gallatin
James Shields [U.S. Senator seating unconstitutional and annulled]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Shields
Thus it is very clear that winning a popular election does not trump, amend, or nullify the constitution of a state or the U.S. federal constitution. Obama is not constitutionally eligible to be the President and Command in Chief of the military and should be removed from office and his election, confirmation, and swearing in annulled.
Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
Please if you can, visit this site and help the cause:
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####
Attorney Mario Apuzzo and Commander Charles Kerchner were guests on the Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate on November 17th. Interview at Source.
New Washington Times Eligibility Ad; Atty Apuzzo & Plaintiff Nelsen were guests on the Howie Mandel Show to Discuss Kerchner v Obama et al. Interview at Source.
YouTube: Attorney Mario Apuzzo & Commander Charles Kerchner Discuss Their Obama Eligibility Case at Supreme Court on Les Naiman Radio Show. Part 1 embedded below, rest at Source.
Atty Apuzzo & CDR Kerchner were guests on the Howie Mandel Radio Show hosted by Jim ‘Howie’ Mandel - Tues 09 Nov 2010, 4:00 p.m. EST. Interview at Source.
Visit the Birther Vault for the long list of evidence against Hawaii officials and all of the people questioning Obama’s eligibility; [http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-ltc-terry-lakins-attorney-on-cnn.html].
Kerchner v Obama Petition Scheduled for Conference at Supreme Court-15Nov2010 Wash Times Natl Wkly
I’ve re-read Attorney Apuzzo’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari for Kerchner now that the Nov 23 date is approaching. The thing that hits me is that this magnificent piece of work is and will be historic for either of two reasons: (1) as the basis for address by the Supreme Court or (2) as the basis for redress by the people.
I pray, as I am certain Mr. Apuzzo and Commander Kerchner do, that the document is historic for the first reason, and not the second. But, either way, it WILL be historic.
SARAH PALIN CAN SAVE AMERICA WITH ONE SIMPLE ACT
Governor Palin is a courageous person, no doubt. In view of her massive following, if she would simply, briefly, tweet about the upcoming case before the US Supreme Court next week, it would change the course of American history.
November 23, 2010 marks a fork in the road for the future of America of more than historic proportions — perhaps on par with events leading to the Civil War. To date, virtually all federal and state courts where actions have been brought seeking decision on the meaning of the Constitution’s Article 2 “natural born citizen” clause as a prerequisite for Barack Obama to be a lawful President and Commander in Chief of the United States (Mr. Obama having been born to a father of British/Kenyan nationality and father not a citizen of the United States), have been shut down, never getting beyond the issue of standing. To date, courts have very strategically (narrowly if not artfully) characterized and applied law and legal procedure steadfastly to prevent the question from ever rising to the merits — this on a host of different types and classes of plaintiffs, causes and defendants — admittedly under the most intensely implicit (if not more) pressure to do the same.
The national media (some say our 4th branch of government) has aided and abetted the avoidance by mischaracterizing this as a “Hawaii birth” a/k/a “birther” issue which is nothing more than a “red herring” in that the issue for Article 2 “natural born citizen” is Mr. Obama’s father. Moreover, the legal community has aided and abetted the avoidance by mischaracterizing the 1898 Supreme Court Case, Wong Kim Arc, which dealt with the meaning of “citizenship”, not the meaning of “natural born citizen” under Article 2.
November 23, 2010 may very well be the last chance for the Judicial Branch realistically to take up the issue, this on a case of legal standing solidly presented by Attorney Apuzzo and Commander Kerchner. If the Court finds no standing here, by a narrow interpretation of the same or otherwise, coming after all the rest of the “no standing” cases, it is doubtfull this important Constitutional issue can and will be resolved in any court of law. The question will nevertheless continue to fester, at tremendous national cost, never to abate, potentially to reach crisis stage, and in any event to undermine the structure of our Constitutional Republic.
It is more than chilling and says volumes that NOT ONE member of Congress will publicly speak on this or, better yet, since the Congress of the United States has more than a vested interest, opine if not as a “friend of the court” at the Supreme Court, in the court of public opinion — BEFORE the Supreme Court convenes on November 23, 2010.
The world is (should be) watching!
What needs to change is the taboo squeamishness to acknowledge the REAL LAW of the USA:
CRA1866
That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States
Neither Obama nor anchor babies are US Citizens
AN APPEAL TO CONTACT SARAH PALIN…
EVERYONE…do what you can to contact Sarah Palin and tell her to reach out to all America and let everyone know about the Writ of Certiorrai before the Supreme Court and the pending decision to hear the Petition from Cdr. Kerchner re: Obama’s eligibility on Novemeber 23.
PLEASE READ THE POST BELOW FROM GUL READER, TED, WHICH PROVIDES PERSPECTIVE.
If you can Tweet, write on her Facebook or you anyway know how to contact her, please do so today! Time is of the essence!
If you want to write to Sarah Palin (express mail would be best) her address is:
Gov. Sarah Palin
1140 W. Parks Highway
Wasilla, AK 99654
Posted by giveusliberty1776 at 9:49 AM 0 comments
A GUL READER WRITES..
SARAH PALIN CAN SAVE AMERICA WITH ONE SIMPLE ACT
Governor Palin is a courageous person, no doubt. In view of her massive following, if she would simply, briefly, tweet about the upcoming case before the US Supreme Court next week, it would change the course of American history.
November 23, 2010 marks a fork in the road for the future of America of more than historic proportions — perhaps on par with events leading to the Civil War. To date, virtually all federal and state courts where actions have been brought seeking decision on the meaning of the Constitution’s Article 2 “natural born citizen” clause as a prerequisite for Barack Obama to be a lawful President and Commander in Chief of the United States (Mr. Obama having been born to a father of British/Kenyan nationality and father not a citizen of the United States), have been shut down, never getting beyond the issue of standing. To date, courts have very strategically (narrowly if not artfully) characterized and applied law and legal procedure steadfastly to prevent the question from ever rising to the merits — this on a host of different types and classes of plaintiffs, causes and defendants — admittedly under the most intensely implicit (if not more) pressure to do the same.
The national media (some say our 4th branch of government) has aided and abetted the avoidance by mischaracterizing this as a “Hawaii birth” a/k/a “birther” issue which is nothing more than a “red herring” in that the issue for Article 2 “natural born citizen” is Mr. Obama’s father. Moreover, the legal community has aided and abetted the avoidance by mischaracterizing the 1898 Supreme Court Case, Wong Kim Arc, which dealt with the meaning of “citizenship”, not the meaning of “natural born citizen” under Article 2.
November 23, 2010 may very well be the last chance for the Judicial Branch realistically to take up the issue, this on a case of legal standing solidly presented by Attorney Apuzzo and Commander Kerchner. If the Court finds no standing here, by a narrow interpretation of the same or otherwise, coming after all the rest of the “no standing” cases, it is doubtfull this important Constitutional issue can and will be resolved in any court of law. The question will nevertheless continue to fester, at tremendous national cost, never to abate, potentially to reach crisis stage, and in any event to undermine the structure of our Constitutional Republic.
It is more than chilling and says volumes that NOT ONE member of Congress will publicly speak on this or, better yet, since the Congress of the United States has more than a vested interest, opine if not as a “friend of the court” at the Supreme Court, in the court of public opinion — BEFORE the Supreme Court convenes on November 23, 2010.
The world is (should be) watching!
this is what’s been going to Palin blogs:–
* * *
Take a look at these two, The Power of Palin:
http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2010/11/appeal-to-contact-sarah-palin.html
http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2010/11/gul-reader-writes.html
Sarah has had her family’s life threatened numerous times, they burned her church with kids inside…but still someone has to step up and turn the tide.
The 14th Amendment supplanted the CRA of 1866.
David Davis. in your honor moi is hereby baned.
Davey boy, whatever the 14th was “meant” to do, the simple fact is that it did 2 things: It nullified that hideous Dred Scott decision & it codified what had ALWAYS been the case in the U.S., that birth on the soil bestowed citizenship, totally independent of parentage, save for the cases of Native Americans, ambassadors & invading armies. There are ONLY 2 types of citizenship: Natural Born & Naturalized. Birth on soil is Natural Born. Since President Obama was born in Hawaii he is NBC & eligible. Case closed.
If someone were to bring charges against every single hospital in the State of Hawaii for failure to provide documents via the Freedom of Information Act, each and every hospital would have to respond per court order. Each hospital would have to say that they have the documents and provide evidence thereof, or state that the documents do not exist.
Thanks to Pastor Charles, let me have one last thing to say to MOI…
Na.. Na.. Na.. Na.. Hey.. Hey.. Hey…Goodbye !
MOI HAS NO CLUE is right::
Try reading “Slaughterhouse” file.
What about Emmirich de Vattel. Law of Nations in 1758
common law vs law of nations
must read: George D. Collins
http://www.scribd.com/doc/19071886/Are-Persons-Born-Within-the-United-States-Ipso-Facto-Citizens-Thereof-George-D-Collins
In conclusion, to use the language of the Supreme Court of the United States
in the Slaughter House Cases, in reference to the meaning of the first section of the
Fourteenth Amendment before referred to, and which is decisive of this question
“All persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power,
excluding Indians not taxed, are declared to be citizens of the United States”……
“the phrase ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ was intended to exclude from
its operation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States”
(Obama was born a British subject inherited from his father who was never a u.s. citizen.
Fourteenth Amendment http://topics.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv
You don’t believe me…..then check this out!
Slaughter House Cases (appears just past half way down the page)
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0083_0036_ZO.html
That its main purpose was to establish the citizenship of the negro can admit of no doubt. The phrase, “subject to its jurisdiction” was intended to exclude from its operation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States.
(Obama admits he was born a British subject, so therefore he is not entitled jurisdiction of section 1 of the 14 th Amendment)
It is quite clear, then, that there is a citizenship of the United States, and a citizenship of a State, which are distinct from each other, and which depend upon different characteristics or circumstances in the individual.
note: (Obama’s Mother was not old enough to convey u.s. citizenship onto him)
you must be ten years a resident, 5 of which shall be over the age of 14. (19)
Stanley Ann Dunham (mother) was only 18 years old (shy by 3 months)
a. section 301 Dec 24, 1954 (see page 17 of 101)http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86757.pdf
I’m not making this stuff up, read it yourselves……Dan Smith, NY