Obama’s ‘CERTIFICATION of Live Birth’ form reveals Birth Registration FILED but never fully ACCEPTED! - By CDR Charles Kerchner
For Immediate Release - 12 May 2010
Obama’s ‘CERTIFICATION of Live Birth’ form reveals Birth Registration FILED but never fully ACCEPTED!
Obama’s ‘CERTIFICATION of Live Birth’ form reveals his Birth Registration was FILED in 1961 but was never fully ACCEPTED by the Hawaiian State Registrar’s Office. See the lower left corner of Obama’s CERTIFICATION of Live Birth form and the same corner on the other two examples. This indicates there was insufficient evidence back in 1961 to complete the birth registration process. Hawaii is covering this up for political reasons to protect Obama. Only they know the ultimate reasons they are all willing to commit Misprision of Felony at this point in time given the mounting evidence that Obama was not physically born in Hawaii. Obama may have amended his record since 1961 to try to reinforce and cover up the original fraudulent filing. But his online COLB clearly shows that when it was FILED it was never finally ACCEPTED. This is a national disgrace that our entire system of laws including the Constitution and all legal records are being subverted and subordinated to cover up for Obama’s continued fraud on the nation as to his true legal identity. What is so important about this one man that Hawaii is willing to see the nation destroyed by his corruption and lies from birth by his family and continued on all his life by Obama. The man is a grifter and conman. See this catalog of evidence that shows by the preponderance of the evidence that Hawaii and the nation are the victims of birth registration fraud by Obama’s family in 1961:
CDR Charles Kerchner
Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
http://www.protectourliberty.org
####
After the show with on CNN, it said send your comments. I DID. Almost 36 hours now, it still has not be accepted to view. THEY ARE NOT EXCEPTING THIS. Here is what I wrote.
May 10th, 2010 10:37 pm ET
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Obama has not proved he is an natural born citizen. He has paid over 1 million to lawyers to stop anyone who asks. The document he has on line is not the original long form birth certificate issued to an American citizen when born. What he has shown is an CERTIFI-CATION OF LIVE BIRTH. NOT CERTIF-ICATE OF LIVE BIRTH. See the difference? Anyone can get one of these certifICATION when they come from another country to Hawaii. CertifiCATE in long form saying the mother, father, hospital, doctor, weight, length and signature of Doctor with a raised seal from the health department is a true birth certificate.
Why is he paying all this money to keep from showing his ORIGINAL LONG FORM birth certificate and arresting people to ask for proof?
WAKE UP PEOPLE.
(ONLY) THE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES HAS TO BE BORN IN THE UNITED STATES TO BOTH MOTHER AND FATHER WHO ARE AMERICAN CITIZENS BEFORE HIS OR HER BIRTH.
Well, it can’t be discounted as a change in terminology as the two that have “Date Accepted by State Registrar” are dated May 27, 1930 and October 7, 1977. Obummer’s falls between those two, with “Date Filed by Registrar” of August 8, 1961.
So, who knew this or noticed this and when? Was it a matter of getting their hands on different people’s COLBs in order to compare? Inquiring minds want to know.
Everytime I click on a link about the birth certificate, a warning comes up on the top of the article. I believe they are watching. Does anyone else get this?
Jenny, I’ve clicked several times on the blue text link above the graphic, the line that reads: Obama’s ‘CERTIFICATION of Live Birth’ form reveals Birth Registration FILED but never fully ACCEPTED! Each time I’ve clicked on it, it’s opened the page at scribd where the document can be viewed. I opened it earlier and opened it a couple times more just now to see if I might get the message that it’s sending you, but it’s not given me any problems. I hope you can get it to work and that it’s not a problem caused any any third parties, if you know what I mean…and I’m sure you do.
no . THERE’S NO WARNING….. JUST THE FACTS MAM….. car 54 where are you……to go further in 1948 census rules[ STILL STANDING IN 1961)) there is NO AFRICAN RACE EITHER….LISTED as barry ’s FAThER’S RACE… … WHY IS THE REFERENCE NUMBER BLOTTED OUT.. TO VOID THE DOCUMENT… as stated below on the document…… P. S…. where ” IS THE BACK SIDE?”’………….CHECK IT OUT EXECUTIVE ORDER 13489…………. covers it all””” YOU BETCHA” followed up by executive order 13490………go to http://www.archives.gov/federal=register/executiveorders/2009=obama.html…………. IF YOU NEED MORE…
This thing about the birth certificate just rings false. I would bet that they simply changed how the certificates read during that period. Government does stuff like that all the time, including changing the terminology back and forth… and how would the TWO Honolulu papers have birth announcements for him that day if it’s false? The conspiracy is that deep and goes back prior to the man’s birth? Come on, people! I can’t stand Obama, but this stuff just makes all his detractors look insane. Plenty other stuff to criticize.
Adam, BS. States change terminology, but not “back and forth.” The difference between the forms being “Filed With…” and “Accepted By…” was explained in the blog post and, in much greater detail, at Apuzzo’s blog, linked to in the blog post. The birth announcements in HI were generated by filed COLBs in HI in 1961 has also been explained. That home births, without doctors or nurses as witnesses, were still being performed regulatrly in HI in 1961, and COLBs were issued for home-birthed babies has also been explained. That COLBs were issued in HI to anyone with a pulse due to HI becoming a state only a few years earlier has also been explained.
I can smell an Obot troll from a mile off and you, Adam, are one of them. If you weren’t an Obummer supporter, you would have known at least some of these facts.
We don’t care what Obummer’s supporters think of us. Not anymore. And since you’re one of them, we don’t care what you think, either. Bugger off, troll boy.
Yep Adam is an Obot for sure. There are alot of Obots like Adam out there that claim to be “conservatives” or on the “right side of things”. They are either ignorant of facts and life in general as well as a dope or they are an “OBOT” !!!!!!!
Oh, puh-leeze. Because I disagree, I’m an Obot? You should try Googling me and see how much an Obot I am. I can’t stand anything Obama’s done as president. But I can see facts. And the facts are, yes, sometimes the wording on forms does change back and forth over a period of decades.
I notice all this does is compare birth certificates from separate years. That is not an apples-to-apples comparison. Compare it to other birth certificates from the same period — same year, at least, and preferably some in the same month — and see what the wording is. If that had been done, I would give this more credibility. But since it did not, and when you add in the two Honolulu newspapers’ birth announcements, it seems like this is a total red herring.