Orly Taitz - Motion to Transfer Carter Case to Judge Lamberth in Washington DC
AGJ comment: we spilt the Motion up into the key parts so our readers could quickly see what Orly is asking Judge Carter to agree to.
AGJ comment: The US Attorneys representing Obama said Carter could not hear the case BECAUSE of Jurisdiction. They maintained that only a court in Washington DC could hear the case because Obama resided in Washington. Orly agreed! — Wow!
AGJ comment: Bottom line, Orly made a brilliant move. By agreeing to what Obama’s Attorneys argued for they cannot now go back on their request. Orly in effect called their bluff. Now the case should rightfully move to Washington DC. If Judge Carter tries to deny the Motion he will lose complete credibility with the court and be subject to appeal — If Carter rules in favor of the Motion it is an important win for our side — Obama is still in the “hot seat” and Orly deserves a lot of credit for hanging in there — In our humble opinion.
Do you want my legal opinion on the chances for this motion? I’ve been 100% correct on these cases so far.
Well Rikker it is Christmas so I will be nice, anyhow I noticed that you are not so bad afterall. Of course you stand for the wrong people and the abomination currently defiling the Whitehouse in particular.
I must add that you certainly never been right in sofar it pertains Barry Soetoro. You have however accurately predicted the outcome of a number of cases not because of the legal aspects but rather the fact that we are facing a conspiracy of tyranny and usurpation in which cases are not decided on their legal merrits.
But you know what I mean.
OBAMA IS IN THE JURISIDICTION OF ANYWHERE IN THE U.S.A., AND THE PLAINTIFF CAN STATE JURISDICTION TO THEIR CONVENIENCE,
I WILL QUOTE YOU THE FEDERAL STATUTES ON PLACE OF JURISDICTION SOON, AS USUAL, I THINK ORLY TAITZ IS IN ERROR AND MAY BE WORKING FOR OBAMA AS A DISINFORMATION SPECIALIST.
OBAMA WORKS FOR THE WHOLE ENTIRE U.S.A., THEREFORE, THE JURISDICTION IS THE WHOLE ENTIRE U.S.A. WHERE HE WORKS, BECAUSE THIS IS A WORK RELATED ISSUE, BUT FOR THE FACT THAT THIS IS A WORK RELATED ISSUE, THERE WOULD BE NO ISSUE. THE ISSUE IS WHETHER OR NOT HE HAS A LEGAL RIGHT TO HOLD HIS JOB, THEREFORE IT IS A WORK RELATED ISSUE, AND THE JURISDICTION IS HIS PLACE OF WORK, NOT WHERE HE LIVES, AND HE WORKS IN THE WHOLE U.S.A.
NEVER, EVER, EVER
BELIEVE ANYONE
WITHOUT SEEING
THE FEDERAL CODES AND STATUTES.
I WILL GET THEM, PROBABLY LATER TODAY OR
TONIGHT.
ORLY TAITZ ANNOYS THE HELL OUT OF ME FOR
FILING THE WRONG ACTIONS IN THE WRONG COURTS AND ACTING LIKE SHE IS A DISINFORMATION SPECIALIST FOR OBAMA.
REMEMBER,
OBAMA SIGNS HIS NAME WITH WHAT SOME PEOPLE MAY SEE AS A RUSSIAN LETTER O
http://crisericson2010.blogspot.com
for photo of Obama’s signature and
picture of Russian alphabet.
Orly Taitz is allegedly from Russia.
WE DON’T KNOW WHERE OBAMA IS FROM.
OBAMA MIGHT BE FROM RUSSIA FOR ALL WE KNOW.
ORLY COULD BE OBAMA’S COUSIN FOR ALL WE KNOW.
How does one transfer a case that has already been dismissed with prejudice?
Isn’t that sort of like scheduling an oil change for a car that has already been junked and shredded?
So, you think the defendant’s attorneys lied when they said the only proper place the action could be filed was in Washington , D.c.?
And that the DOJ attorneys lied about that to the court?
Perhaps so!
JackO
This latest action by Taitz will be summarily dismissed by Carter’s court. It is a ploy Taitz is using to salvage her floundering credibility in the face of accusations of adultery by Lucas Smith and Charles Edward Lincoln, her erstwhile compatriots.
Carter won’t bother to send this case to Lamberth. Lamberth has already slapped down Berg and Hemenway. Why should he countenance Taitz?
And David, you like to say that these cases haven’t been decided on the merits. I say differently. I say the judges look at the issues being debated and decide proactively that Orly’s cases have no chance. They are doing her a favor by dismissing her claims.
Mr. Rkker,
Yes sure the conspirators of tyranny and usurpation are doing her and the American People a favor by collaborating with the usurper. Mr. Rikker forgive saying this but your logic is pretty much twisted.
But just maybe you understand why I am often rejecting your comments, I am only doing you a favor by protecting you from making a fool of yourself.
Well, David, its interesting that a site that’s so concerned with “our heritage” resorts to censorship to uphold that heritage. It seems to me that censorship of written ideas is somebody else’s heritage, if you catch my drift.
As for the”Usurper”, Obama has yet to be even briefly touched by the scandal you’ve accused him of. He ignores you, as does the Congress, as do the courts, as do most Americans.
This doesnt mean you are wrong.
It just means that your issues have neither legs nor any grouundswell of support. Eligibility supporters are as effective as flat-earthers.
Meanwhile, the rest of us are trying to move our country into an uncertain future.
Mr. Rikker,
Well whatever scary it may be we seem be reaching some sort of understanding on fundamental issues.
Unless I am still somewhat jet-lagged (have been traveling) causing me to misread what you are saying we now seem to agree on:
1) Obama being a usurper, or a least that you don’t fully exclude him being a usurper.
2) That we in fact are facing a conspiracy of tyranny and usurpation conform the Dr. Viera definition of what that entails.
In respect to censorship a blog is more like a magazine than a bulletin board which means that blog editors will generally be more restrictive in respect to what can be published and what not.
However I must confess that during the last few months I have been overly restrictive. That doesn’t mean that from now on everything goes but at least to a certain extend you do have a point.
Actually, I’m not saying Obama is a Usurper at all. He won the election fair and square.
What I’m saying is that being in opposition to the Congress, courts, and public opinion does not necessarily make you wrong. Very often the majority opinion IS in the wrong.
In Obama’s case, I think you’ve convicted him using innuendo and an absence of evidence, evidence which you assume is being withheld by the State of Hawaii.
If your rights REALLY were being trampled under a tyrranical government, you wouldn’t be allowed to publish this blog.
Mr. Rikker,
You seem to forget that we are a Constitutional Republic rather than a democracy, which in this case means that being elected doesn’t mean anything. The man is usurper on the basis of the fact that he is ineligible.
Now what is a Constitutional Republic, see this video and you will understand why your fair and square remark is moot
The mistake you are making is that you seem to be placing the Congress, courts, and public opinion above the Constitution.
I spoke about a conspiracy of tyranny and usurpation, obviously you seem not to understand what this entails namely in situation in which:
1. A usurper has been installed in the Whitehouse.
2. Representatives and Senators in Congress have leagued together in a conspiracy of usurption and tyranny.
3. Justices of the Supreme Court have surrendered and went in league with the conspiracy.
Furthermore I must point at the fact that the man is no natural born citizen regardless whether he was born on Hawaii or in Kenya.
JackO,
You need to reread the transcript from the Oct 5th hearing. The defense said that the correct jurisdiction would likely be DC, IF the courts had jurisdiction; the courts, in every one of the 60 eligibility cases have decided that the courts have NO jurisdiction. The defense pointed out the Orly would have to file a new quo warranto case in DC, but that it wouldn’t be applicable to the POTUS.
So, no, the defense didn’t lie to the court.
If Orly wants to file a quo warranto, she needs to draft a new case and file in DC. But, it is meaningless for her to do so.
Orly is trying this Hail Mary because she doesn’t want to go into appeals. Appeals take a long time. But, she won’t win on appeal and she knows it. This is why she wants this transferred to another district court. So, Orly argues that appealing the case takes too long, so she tries to transfer a non-existent case that can’t be moved, thus wasting at least a month of time that she could be in the appeals process.
Finally, Carter found that now that the election is over, none of the Barnett plaintiffs have standing any way.
Orly simply wants us to think that she is doing something productive. She isn’t.
yet if someone has been murdered….the murderer can be tried for murder for 7 years…. IS THIS PROPER CASE WORK? i am not a lawyer.. and need your guidance…
IF ITS SO SIMPLE? WHY IS OBAMA OR WHOEVER HE IS PRODUCE ALL RECORDS AND REAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE? WHY THEY SAY HE HAS SPENT TRYING TO KEEP EVERYTHING LOCKED UP CLOSE TO 2 MILLION DOLLARS? NOW IF YOUR NOT GUILTY AND NOT HIDEING YOUR PAST? WHY WOULD YOU DO THIS>>>>>JUST AN AMERICAN TAXPAYING LEGAL CITIZEN>>>CAN OBAMA SAY THAT??>>
Gary, it would be more accurate to say:
“Obama has spent close to 2 million dollars in legal fees. Of this total, we can reasonably surmise that he has spent almost 2 thousand dollars defending the three lawsuits that required his response. He won all three lawsuits via dismissal. In one of the suits the judge ordered the plaintiffs to pay Mr. Obama’s legal fees, a total amounting to $520.
Why would Mr. Obama pay almost 2 thousand dollars when he could have paid $20 to get the State of Hawaii to send yet another COLB that is acceptable to his critics?”
This statement is more literally accurate than yours. It’s dishonest to assume all of Mr. Obama’s legal fees are concentrated on Orly Taitz’ allegations. After all, there is a guy in Pennsylvania that is suing Obama for trillions. He thinks Obama owes America the entire national debt, and he wants the full total deposited in his bank account. His lawsuit had to be addressed and paid for, too.