New Ad - Obama is an Unconstitutional Illegal Putative President - 14 Dec 2009 Issue of the Washington Times National Weekly Edition - page 15
A Place to Ask Questions To Get the Right Answers published
New Ad - Obama is an Unconstitutional Illegal Putative President - 14 Dec 2009 Issue of the Washington Times National Weekly Edition - page 15
Obama is a usurper. Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. See this 14 Dec 2009 issue of the Washington Times National Weekly edition - pg 15. To be a “natural born Citizen” as is required in the U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, the person must be born in the country to parents who both are Citizens of the country when the child was born. Obama’s father was a British Subject when Obama was born in 1961. Obama’s father was never a U.S. Citizen nor was he even an immigrant to the USA.
We are a nation of immigrants but Obama Sr. was not one. And under the British Nationality Act of 1948 and international law, Obama (Jr.) was also born a British Subject and thus is a dual-citizen Citizen to this day, if he was born in Hawaii as he claims. To date, he has not conclusively proved exactly where he was born to any investigative controlling legal authority. Photoshop’d digital images and pictures of computerized summary data put on the internet proffered by Obama proves nothing. Computerized records say his birth was “registered” in the Hawaii birth system. That computer data registration record could have been based on false birth location registration testimony by a family member using a simple mail-in form available in 1961. GIGO - false location of birth registration in yields false data out today on a computer print out. The original “ribbon copy” long-form birth records with the names and signatures of medical attendants and of witnesses, if any, to the alleged birth in Hawaii must be examined by experts as well as all his other hidden and sealed records of his early life. If he was born in Kenya as his relatives and news account there claim, then Obama could even be an illegal alien since his mother was not old enough under U.S. laws at that time to convey U.S. citizenship to her child born of a foreign father if the child is born in a foreign country. Obama had dual allegiance at birth if he was born in Hawaii - British via his father and U.S. via his mother. How can a person born a British Subject and a dual-citizen ever be considered a “natural born Citizen” of the USA with sole allegiance to the USA per the intent of our nation’s founders and framers, to Constitutional standards, for the office of the Presidency? He cannot. See the 3 enablers who have allowed this trampling of our Constitution and who will allow our Liberty to be destroyed if we do not put an end to this usurpation by Obama. Let others know about this. Pass this on to friends and family. Send it to your Congress person. Write letters to the editors of your newspapers. And if you personally know any federal Judge anywhere, use your 1st amendment freedom of speech while you still have it. Tell them what a disgrace the federal judicial system has become in this matter too. Show them the current new ad above and this quote by Chief Justice John Marshall ad too and other ads in our series. Synergy at work! If we all do a little, together we will accomplish a lot! The truth and our Constitution will win in the end if we all do our part. If not, the future of our nation is in great danger.
For more information as to why Obama is an illegal putative president, see:
~Natural born citizenship requires both your parents to be Citizens when you are born:
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/natural-born-citizen-clause-requires.html
~The 3 Enablers of Obama’s Usurpation of Office:
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/obamas-lack-of-eligibility-three.html
Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
Please help the cause to fund more ads to educate the People about Obama’s usurpation of his office: http://www.protectourliberty.org/
###
This video touched my heart!Please pass this along to everyone!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-7t3TDiQmI&feature=related
This is awesome but why not go a step farther and put his school record that shows him a citizen of Indonesia?
“This is awesome but why not go a step farther and put his school record that shows him a citizen of Indonesia?”
Yes. Indonesia would not have allowed Barry Soetoro to become an Indonesian National (Citizen) if he had not renounced his US citizenship. Contrary to popular (internet) opinion, minors can and do renounce their US citizenship to become a citizen of another country.
All Barry had to do was explain to a Embassy Representative in Jakarta that his birth father was absent from his life and did not provide support. His mother married an Indonesian and they planned to spend the rest of their lives in Indonesia. A name change from Barack Obama II to Barry Soetoro is a strong indicator Barry intended to spend the rest of his life with the Soetoros in Indonesia.
The US State Dept would not stand in the way of Barry’s chance of happiness. No one could have predicted the Soetoro marriage would have ended in divorce. Besides, a minor can reaffirm their US Citizenship before they turn 18 years and 6 months if they are pro-active.
Whatever are Kirchner and Apuzzo going to do now that the Washington Times is folding?
Dick Whitman….
The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, section 349 (a), provided:
“From and after the effective date of this Act a person who is a national of the United States whether by birth or naturalization, shall lose his nationality by — (1) obtaining naturalization in a foreign state upon his own application, upon an application filed in his behalf by a parent, or duly authorized agent, or through the naturalization of a parent having legal custody of such person: Provided, That nationality shall not be lost by any person under this section as the result of the naturalization of a parent or parents while such person is under the age of twenty-one years, or as the result of naturalization obtained on behalf of a person under twenty-one years of age by a parent, guardian, or duly authorized agent, unless such person shall fail to enter the United States to establish a permanent residence prior to his twenty-fifth birthday: ….”
This is getting to be like whipping a dead horse. Little Barry! With the Selective Service (FOIA) forms forged to suit the dead horse walked away. Is he even actually twenty-five?
Veteran;
7 FAM 1254.1 Minors
a. Sections 403(b) NA provided that persons could not divest themselves of U.S. nationality before attaining the age 16. However, there is no legal minimum age under which renunciation is not permitted.
Barry had to opportunity to reaffirm his US citizenship until he was 18 years and 6 months. He chose not to do that.