WE’RE IN BIG TROUBLE Commentary - By David Kaiser
Dr. Orly Taitz published
Monday, November 23, 2009 9:57 AM From: “Jack Alpan” Add sender to Contacts To: Undisclosed-Recipient@yahoo.com From SB: HE’S RIGHT, WE’RE IN BIG TROUBLE *… It is worse than that!!!
A THREE MINUTE LESSON IN COMMON SENSE THINKING:
He is correct!
David Kaiser is a respected historian whose published works have covered a broad range of topics, from European Warfare to American League Baseball.. Born in 1947, the son of a diplomat, Kaiser spent his childhood in three capital cities: Washington D.C, Albany , New York , and Dakar , Senegal . He attended Harvard University , graduating there in 1969 with a B..A. in history. He then spent several years more at Harvard, gaining a PhD in history, which he obtained in 1976. He served in the Army Reserve from 1970 to 1976.
He is a professor in the Strategy and Policy Department of the United States Naval War College. He has previously taught at Carnegie Mellon, Williams College and Harvard University . Kaiser’s latest book, The Road to Dallas, about the Kennedy assassination, was just published by Harvard University Press.
Dr. David Kaiser
History Unfolding
I am a student of history. Professionally, I have written 15 books on history that have been published in six languages, and I have studied history all my life. I have come to think there is something monumentally large afoot, and I do not believe it is simply a banking crisis, or a mortgage crisis, or a credit crisis. Yes these exist, but they are merely single facets on a very large gemstone that is only now coming into a sharper focus.
Something of historic proportions is happening. I can sense it because I know how it feels, smells, what it looks like, and how people react to it. Yes, a perfect storm may be brewing, but there is something happening within our country that has been evolving for about ten to fifteen years. The pace has dramatically quickened in the past two.
We demand and then codify into law the requirement that our banks make massive loans to people we know they can never pay back? Why?
We learned just days ago that the Federal Reserve, which has little or no real oversight by anyone, has “loaned” two trillion dollars (that is $2,000,000,000,000) over the past few months, but will not tell us to whom or why or disclose the terms. That is our money. Yours and mine. And that is three times the $700 billion we all argued about so strenuously just this past September. Who has this money? Why do they have it? Why are the terms unavailable to us? Who asked for it? Who authorized it? I thought this was a government of “we the people,” who loaned our powers to our elected leaders. Apparently not.
We have spent two or more decades intentionally de-industrializing our economy.. Why?
We have intentionally dumbed down our schools, ignored our history, and no longer teach our founding documents, why we are exceptional, and why we are worth preserving. Students by and large cannot write, think critically, read, or articulate. Parents are not revolting, teachers are not picketing, school boards continue to back mediocrity.. Why?
We have now established the precedent of protesting every close election (violently in California over a proposition that is so controversial that it simply wants marriage to remain defined as between one man and one woman. Did you ever think such a thing possible just a decade ago?) We have corrupted our sacred political process by allowing unelected judges to write laws that radically change our way of life, and then mainstream Marxist groups like ACORN and others to turn our voting system into a banana republic. To what purpose?
Now our mortgage industry is collapsing, housing prices are in free fall, major industries are failing, our banking system is on the verge of collapse, social security is nearly bankrupt, as is Medicare and our entire government. Our education system is worse than a joke (I teach college and I know precisely what I am talking about) – the list is staggering in its length, breadth, and depth.. It is potentially 1929 x ten…And we are at war with an enemy we cannot even name for fear of offending people of the same religion, who, in turn, cannot wait to slit the throats of your children if they have the opportunity to do so.
And finally, we have elected a man that no one really knows anything about, who has never run so much as a Dairy Queen, let alone a town as big as Wasilla , Alaska . All of his associations and alliances are with real radicals in their chosen fields of employment, and everything we learn about him, drip by drip, is unsettling if not downright scary (Surely you have heard him speak about his idea to create and fund a mandatory civilian defense force stronger than our military for use inside our borders? No? Oh, of course. The media would never play that for you over and over and then demand he answer it. Sarah Palin’s pregnant daughter and $150,000 wardrobe are more important.)
Mr. Obama’s winning platform can be boiled down to one word: Change.. Why?
I have never been so afraid for my country and for my children as I am now.
This man campaigned on bringing people together, something he has never, ever done in his professional life. In my assessment, Obama will divide us along philosophical lines, push us apart, and then try to realign the pieces into a new and different power structure. Change is indeed coming. And when it comes, you will never see the same nation again.
And that is only the beginning..
As a serious student of history, I thought I would never come to experience what the ordinary, moral German must have felt in the mid-1930s In those times, the “savior” was a former smooth-talking rabble-rouser from the streets, about whom the average German knew next to nothing. What they should have known was that he was associated with groups that shouted, shoved, and pushed around people with whom they disagreed; he edged his way onto the political stage through great oratory.. Conservative “losers” read it right now.
And there were the promises. Economic times were tough, people were losing jobs, and he was a great speaker. And he smiled and frowned and waved a lot. And people, even newspapers, were afraid to speak out for fear that his “brown shirts” would bully and beat them into submission. Which they did – regularly. And then, he was duly elected to office, while a full-throttled economic crisis bloomed at hand – the Great Depression. Slowly, but surely he seized the controls of government power, person by person, department by department, bureaucracy by bureaucracy. The children of German citizens were at first, encouraged to join a Youth Movement in his name where they were taught exactly what to think. Later, they were required to do so. No Jews of course,
How did he get people on his side? He did it by promising jobs to the jobless, money to the money-less, and rewards for the military-industrial complex. He did it by indoctrinating the children, advocating gun control, health care for all, better wages, better jobs, and promising to re-instill pride once again in the country, across Europe , and across the world. He did it with a compliant media – did you know that? And he did this all in the name of justice and ……. change. And the people surely got what they voted for.
If you think I am exaggerating, look it up. It’s all there in the history books.
So read your history books. Many people of conscience objected in 1933 and were shouted down, called names, laughed at, and ridiculed. When Winston Churchill pointed out the obvious in the late 1930s while seated in the House of Lords in England (he was not yet Prime Minister), he was booed into his seat and called a crazy troublemaker. He was right, though. And the world came to regret that he was not listened to.
Do not forget that Germany was the most educated, the most cultured country in Europe . It was full of music, art, museums, hospitals, laboratories, and universities. And yet, in less than six years (a shorter time span than just two terms of the U. S. presidency) it was rounding up its own citizens, killing others, abrogating its laws, turning children against parents, and neighbors against neighbors. All with the best of intentions, of course. The road to Hell is paved with them.
As a practical thinker, one not overly prone to emotional decisions, I have a choice: I can either believe what the objective pieces of evidence tell me (even if they make me cringe with disgust); I can believe what history is shouting to me from across the chasm of seven decades; or I can hope I am wrong by closing my eyes, having another latte, and ignoring what is transpiring around me..
I choose to believe the evidence. No doubt some people will scoff at me, others laugh, or think I am foolish, naive, or both. To some degree, perhaps I am. But I have never been afraid to look people in the eye and tell them exactly what I believe-and why I believe it.
I pray I am wrong. I do not think I am. Perhaps the only hope is our vote in the next elections.
David Kaiser
Jamestown , Rhode Island
United States
Pass this along. Perhaps it will help to begin the awakening of America as to where we are headed…….

Has the format changed here ? I posted something and it didnt get posted… too long maybe is was a us code
Rick M.
I have been searching for a long posting, it looks like we had a system problem of some sort. Don’t worry there are no policy changes and you are one of the most respected commentators here.
My apologies for what seems a system problem.
- David Crockett
No RickM. Go head and send the link here. There is just so much news coming out now. We don’t get the articles sometimes. Please understand we are working hard to bring stories forward. Sorry if we missed it.
Thank You,
Lynn Dartez
have no fear the president says he was dddeeeply CONCERNED ABOUT THE 10.2 UNEMPLOYMENT STATUS…BEFORE firing 1/6 of AMERICA’S health care wealth……to be more exact THE UNEMPLOYMENT figure ///// u 6 is 22.2 per cent soooo where’s the CONCERN for the other….12 per cent….[ NOT ACCOUNTED FOR]?
Davey:
Will you please link this wonderful article.
Thanks!
Hugh,
I have been searching for a link other than to Dr. Orly Taitz, who published it on her site. For a matter of fact she removed it from her site. If you have a link please let me know so I can add it in.
FYI, this is a great article that’s been circulating on the web for several months. It was not written by this David Kaiser - just google and you will find he has his own blog and denies writing this.
This is well written and I have no idea why the original author used this Kaiser’s name.
No matter who wrote this article, it is dead on.
It’s my personal opinion that we put down the crying towel and get the hell busy.
The only solution I can see is that our Military arrest Obama for treason.
Constitutional Authority for the removal for Barack Hussein Obama
As the check to political balance which has been neutralized by the Legislative and Judicial in failing to uphold the Constitution.
The Constitution actually lays out quite clearly a Madison gaping hole to override a corrupt government not adhering to the said Constitution.
Article 2, Section 1, begins the process in complete context:
In case of the removal of the President from office, or of his death, resignation, or inability to discharge the powers and duties of the said office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by law provide for the case of removal, death, resignation or inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what officer shall then act as President, and such officer shall act accordingly, until the disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.
Officer in not being defined, does not preclude any legal American, which includes Officer of the United States Military, who are in effect, ever Citizen of the United States in being armed Citizens by the Second Amendment for recreation, pleasure, self defense and national defense.
Building upon this, Article 2, Congress and the American people enacted the 25th Amendment.
In section 4, the following Constitutional Law is triggered to remove a President or someone in the White House Executive.
Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.
Notice with special attention that the Amendment speaks of the principal officers of the executive, or such other body AS CONGRESS may declare by written declaration that the President is unable to discharge his duties.
To explain, the Amendment does not specify ONLY Congress, it simply gives example of the Executive or other government bodies such as Congress.
For the record, the United States military as in the armed militia citizenry or the standing military are bodies within the government of legal standing who can indeed upon meeting declare an occupant of the Oval Office unable to discharge such duties.
The meeting would in the military context, be one of Military Court Martial as set up by the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
All that is necessary is a commanding officer, as in even a retired officer, such as are being represented by Orly Taitz, to assemble other officers, who would number 3 for a Military Tribunal to hear such charges in an investigation to court martial of an occupant of the White House, as the President is the Citizen, is the armed Citizen is the Second Amendment, is the US Military.
A President is further enabled as militarily biased in giving and receiving salutes, flying on Marine One, flying on Air Force One and having his own military compound of Camp David.
A President as Commander in Chief is not a civilian head of the Executive, but a quasi military officer who often as most Presidents even dress in military apparrel.
The case of Pvt. Joshua Fry is of particular importance of the court martial of Barack Hussein Obama, as Pvt. Fry was autistic and found to have pedophilia photos. Mr. Obama has been designated suffering from several psychopathies. His Roman holiday exposed a perverse nature involving teenage girls.
All of these events equal the removal of Pvt. Fry and Mr. Obama.
Mr. Obama’s criminal acts though are much deeper in his derilection of duty, his placing Americans in deliberate harm’s way in Nidal Hasan who worked for Mr. Obama and his policy in Afghanistan not allowing US Soldiers to fire unless fired upon first in a combat situation.
In addition, Mr. Obama has been utilizing the US military as a diplomatic assassin squad in murdering “bad” terrorists while befriending “good” terrorists.
A court martial on these events once enacted by any US officer, and assembled general court martial is not subject to Congress, the Executive, Judicial nor the Military as it is an entity of last resort. It is so proven as that by James Madison’s exact vague language and the vaggaries of the 25th Amendment which literally stipulate by not stipulating, as the 10th Amendment, that the US military reserves the right to court martial any sitting person of the Executive in it’s legal right of checks and balances.
The court martial is only 3 to 4 officers assembled, a prosecutor and a provided defense attorney for Mr. Obama.
Upon the evidence, the officers of the general court martial pass sentence from death, prison, to dishonorable discharge to bad conduct.
Once this legal Constitutional Court convicts Mr. Obama, he is immediately ineligable to occupy the White House and can be taken into custody without parole for immediate imprisonment in a military prison such as Fort Leavenworth.
Mr. Obama could not appeal to Congress nor the Courts, but only to the Court of Appeals of the Armed Forces. Only 20% of those cases though are reviewed per year.
Only if the Court of Appeals agrees may a case then be reviewed by the Supreme Court.
The entire Military Code of Justice was designed to keep political whims from supplanting justice, the code is therefore administered by officers and gentlemen.
The civilian legalites would prefer that ‘only impeachment’ can remove an Executive, but the Constitutional Law opens up vast arenas of those Citizens representing bodies within the United States proper.
Mr. Obama could be removed by court martial and once that was accomplished, no orders he would give to the military would be no longer followed, and, by Constitutional Law a convicted criminal could no longer administer the Office of the President.
The legalites would claim this does not exist in the Constitution, but in fact it does as the brilliant fail safe of the Founders Inspired by God.