Homeland (In)Security Appoints Devout Muslims
You bet those are more than willing to come after us rather than the terorrists who want do us harm. -David
DefendUSx published
Arif Alikhan
Just days after the terrorist shooting at Fort Hood, Texas by a devout Muslim in the military, Janet Napolitanto appointed two other devout Muslims to positions within the Department of Homeland Security.
Devout Muslim Arif Alikhan was appointed to Assistant Secretary for Policy Development at DHS. Before his appointment, Alikhan was Deputy Mayor of Los Angeles – in charge of public safety for the city – a position he held since 2006.
In 2007, Alikhan was instrumental in removing the Muslim terror tracking plan in Los Angeles.
Kareem Shora
Also appointed was devout Muslim Kareem Shora, who was born in Damascus, Syria. Shora is now a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council (HSAC).
His appointment was loudly applauded by the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Comittee (ADC).
Shora joined ADC in 2000 as legal council and is a vocal advocate for Muslim civil rights.
The ADC reportedly has close ties to anti-Israel professor Rashid Khalidi.
TYPICAL OF THAT JANET NAPOLITANO, SHE IS WORSE IN SOME WAYS THAT THE HEAD SNAKE IN THE WHITE HOUSE. THINGS DO NOT LOOK GOOD TODAY, I AM CANCELLING MY AARP AS THEY ARE FOR THE HEALTHCARE AND I WILL GO CALL THEM NOW. DOES ANYBODY THINK WE ARE ON THE RIGHT TRACK, TO GET RID OF THE HEAD SNAKE, I AM SO DOUBTFUL AND WISH HIM SO MANY PROBLEMS, MAYBE HE WILL GIVE UP, NO, NOT SURE OF ANYTHING. PRAYER FOR OBAMA PSALM 109:8 GOD BLESS AMERICA
Nothing like having our nose rubbed in it!!!
This is going to stop. Muslims, of any kind, are no longer to be in our government or hold any office anywhere.
I don’t need my nose rubbed in it. I know America is being brought down by Islam and I won’t stand by and let it happen.
Obama and his crew of bandits need to be removed peacefully, if at all possible. If not, so be it.
this is off topic, but does anyone know about this?
go to http://www.loc.gov/law
or
http://uscode.houjse.gov/search/criteria.shtml
or any online law library
and read Title 18 United States Code
18 USC Section 1901
Collecting or disbursing officer trading in public property
Whoever, being an officer of the United States concerned in the collection or the disbursement of the revenues thereof, carries on any trade or business in the funds or debts of the United States, or of any State, or in any public property of either, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and shall be removed from office, and be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
huh?
what does that mean regarding the bank bailouts and all?
Goldie, I have never responded to your posts etc I respect you and from what I have gathered your a ww2 veteran. Thank you so much for that service. I have been watching the history channels ww2 in color series all this week.
I ask you to reconsider your prayer for Obama (PSALM 109:8 ) for this reason:
Note that I am not an Obama supporter. But I do stand up for correct use of the Bible. Please read this whole post before posting a comment, your concern may already be addressed.
What does the President of the United States have to do with Psalm 109:8? Apparently, many people are passing this around the internet, as a prayer of curse against President Obama.
“Let his days be few, and let another take his office.” – Psalm 109:8
By itself, it seems relatively harmless. But take note of the next verse:
“Let his children be fatherless, and his wife a widow.” – Psalm 109:9
Using a single verse like this is dangerous for several reasons. First, it’s taking a single short verse out of a very specific and detailed context, trying to use it in a way it’s not intended. Secondly, it’s essentially praying for a person to die young (Because of the context). Remember, when what is now the Bible was originally written, it wasn’t divided into verses. This particular passage would have been written in ancient Hebrew which had no punctuation either. Talking about these as “separate verses” without connection or context is simply inaccurate. If we could take any single verse and use it as it sits alone, then we could justify just about any behavior we want. Try Numbers 31:17 all by itself to see what I mean.
Additionally, this is not a good Christian attitude or thought process.
27 But I say to you who hear: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, 28 bless those who curse you, and pray for those who spitefully use you. 29 To him who strikes you on the one cheek, offer the other also. And from him who takes away your cloak, do not withhold your tunic either. 30 Give to everyone who asks of you. And from him who takes away your goods do not ask them back. 31 And just as you want men to do to you, you also do to them likewise. – Luke 6:27-31
Jesus clearly teaches two lessons in the short passage above which are directly relevant here. 1) If you consider President Obama to be “an enemy”, then you should love him. That might be hard, but remember this: Love is not just a feeling, it is defined by your actions and behavior even when you don’t feel like being loving. 2) The Golden Rule. Jesus gave that to us. Do you want people to pray for a curse on you? Nobody of sound mind would answer yes.
As a soldier I would do what it takes to slay my enemies but now is not the time.
I am sorry I do not mean to be rude as I mentioned I respect you and your posts.
THE PRESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE ORDER SEALING PRESIDENT OBAMA’S PERSONAL RECORDS IS LISTED AT THE WHITEHOUSE.GOV WITHOUT THE ENTIRE TEXT OF THE DOCUMENT, AND YOU CAN FIND THE ENTIRE TEXT AT
FEDERAL REGISTER/Vol. 74, No.c 15/Monday, January 26, 2009/Presidential documents
With the President’s handwritten signature and
this text: [FR Doc. E9-712 Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 am] Billing code 3195-W9-P
which proves that the taxpayers were billed for the attorneys fees and paralegal research
costs and secretarial fees and all costs for advising the President to conceal his
personal records from the public.
The text of the document includes,
Section 1.
(g) A “substantial question of executive privilege” exists if NARA’s disclosure of
Presidential records might impair national security (including the conduct of foreign
Relations), law enforcement, or the deliberative processes of the executive branch.
Well, of course national security would be impaired if we knew that President Obama is
Not a natural born citizen and if he was born in Kenya or in Indonesia, then other
countries would be jealous of those countries because they would expect they were
receiving special treatment.
Law enforcement would be impaired from stopping illegal aliens from entering our
Country if President Obama is not a natural born citizen, and in fact, may not be
legally a citizen, so illegal aliens would go wild crashing our borders.
Of course the “deliberative processes of the executive branch” would be impaired
because President Obama would be having none, he’d be on trial for fraud in a fiduciary
capacity.