« Very Important: 10 KGB tactics used by Obots and Obama-maniacs // Is eligibility attorney Robert Bauer moving to the White House? Why? »
DOJ notifies Judge Carter re: Kerchner ruling - with thanks to Citizens Against Pro-Obama Media Bias
Posted on October 23rd, 2009 by David-Crockett
It clearly shows that Judge Carter doesn’t deserve to be addressed as such the guy is looking for the easy way out while making sure not to upset the Usurper-in-Chief. I may be wrong but Carter has sold out.
-David Crockett
Maybe Judge Carter was waiting for Judge Simandle’s ruling granting dismissal in the Kerchner case. It came down Tuesday and the DOJ just made Judge Carter officially aware of it. I believe Judge Carter must be waiting for something because after reading more of the court proceedings it’s become clear he would find it hard to rule against barry no matter where his birth. So why else is he delaying his ruling?
My opinion is carter was absolutely waiting for kirchner decision before announcing his. Carter has been gotten to. bob bauer obama personal attorney is with perkins coie firm, BASED out of seattle. From this area comes siddarth velamoor, the new carter law clerk. Also on 10/22 glenn beck show, beck strongly hinted that bob bauer is getting white house job, possibly the new obama white house counsel!!
Oath takers will probably be dismissed by Judge Carter. Kerchner was an oath taker and not a Presidential candidate.
Keyes and Drake will get standing.
If the DOJ had any contact with Judge carter outside of the case with out Orly being present to excude this new finding of the other case than the judge is by al lmeans a crook. The law does not allow any party to the a pending case to have counsel be it writing and or verbal in the matters affecting this case without both counsels being present. Orly should kick judge carters Butt. He should and has to recuse himself from the case at once if not then we need to go stand in his front yard day and night and protest. The judge is also required by law to arrest whom ever tainted his pending case that is the rule of law. Period.
If carter was absolutely waiting for kirchner decision. Then he has also violated the law by reading outside of the pending case and therefore has violated his oath to the court for which he stands and or has standing. He is not allowed to taint his own mind based on outside information of any kind, It is the same as tampering with the Jury. Judge carter is banded from following other court cases based on their out come because no two cases are Identical.If judge carter drops this case I will personally file these charges on him for fraud and violation of the RICO act with the California state Bar and the Judical review commitee. This was a closed case and he is not allowed to view any other findings of fact untile the case has moved forward and all parties are present. I really hope this Judge carter is ready my posting tonight Because I will come back out of retirement for a peice of justice on the corrupt Judge in fack he will spend the rest of my life fighting Judicial complaints. Signed Pissed off Texan.
Orly’s two cases (Fed District Cts. in Ga and Ca) are pivotally different from Kerchner (Fed District Ct. in NJ).
In fact, it’s no coincidence that Kerchner was dismissed — after waiting many months — right after the the two Orly cases successfully provided avenues to get Obama to account in a way which would NOT throw the courts and nation into constitutional crisis — the big fear of the federal courts (re political question etc.).
Judge Land (Kerchner) case is currently all about Orly merely showing her case not frivolous (premised on need not to chill the rest of Americans from addressing their constitution). Checkmate against Obama!
Likewise, Judge Carter (Keyes) case does not have to deal with the constitutional nightmare of ousting Obama, that is, merely recovery of damages in fraud tort (even nominal) by Candidate Keyes against “Candidate” (not “President”) Obama will do the job — since Congress and the Dems would be politically compelled to oust Obama. Again, checkmate against Obama!
Were either and/or both Orly cases to move forward (standing is ALL that’s needed since it’s SLAM DUNK that Const Art. 2 requires two citizen parents for POTUS eligibility), it’s all over for Obama, because politically his remaining in the Whitehouse, again, would be completely untenable even for the Dems and Congress.
Thus, after Orly files for Motion for Summary Judgment, premised even on all facts in dispute going for Obama (noting that Obama has declared to the world in what as admission against interest, that his dad was Kenyan/British citizen on Baby O’s birth) the Courts can take the case without ever having to deal with discovery on the sole legal issue of meaning/applicabability of Const. Art. 2.
This leaves Team Obama really with its last remaining legal argument (noting that Fed. Ct. can get pendant jurisdiction over Keyes’ tort action):
Const. Art 2. “natural born citizen” = “citizen by birth”
Const. Art 2. “citizen” = “citizen by naturalization”
Nice try, but no cigar!
… especially since all the fuss about McCain and the Senate Resolution would be shown.
So, take heart — and if I’m wrong that’s the current end of our Constitutional Republic (and could mean the second American Revolution since all other means have been turned back by a Government currently under unconstitutional coup d’etat).
I truly sympathize with Judge Carter, and our prayers should be with him, as he says he reads the internet and is aware of these factors (including the possible RICO implications recently filed by Orly and ongoing scrubbing of Obama-foreign born refernces in the Honolulu Advertiser just last week before our very eyes — and during the pendency of Stay on Discovery (apparently being exploited by the “Government” and Dept. of ‘Justice’, no less).
typo in 3rd paragraph, Judge Land is Orly penalty case, not Kerchner.
michael gottlieb– assistant white house counsel…former assistant U.S. attorney Central District California [judge carter district]
Michael Gottlieb
jan 2009
The President has named Michael J. Gottlieb to be Associate Counsel to the President. Mr. Gottlieb recently served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the United States Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California. Prior to this, he was an associate with the law firm of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr. Earlier in his career, he served as a Law Clerk to Justice John Paul Stevens on the Supreme Court of the United States and to Judge Stephen Reinhardt of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Mr. Gottlieb received his bachelor’s degree from Northwestern University and his J.D. from Harvard Law School, where he served as an
editor of the Harvard Law Review.
From where I stand it all smells. Judge Carter’s demeanor has suddenly taken a turn for the worst. It would be good if Carter were surprise us all and call for this trial to MOVVVVVE on !!!! Come on Marine !!
Well it seems all these big-shot lawyers and judges are thicker than thieves sticking together against our Constitution. May the house they serve and the plotting they do fall down around their own ears. They are not stupid. They know Obama has a foreigner for a father. They could’ve used their talent for good. They chose otherwise. They are no better than con men.
Dictators, we are told, are installed into the conspiratorial computers of History. Only Hardware, no Software, can un-install them.
Are we passive, or is it with a resigned sneer, when we utter paraphrases of reality and truisms?
TABERNACLES OF GANGSTERS PROSPER, AND THEY THAT BRIBE HIGH COURTS, ARE SECURE.
Internet rumors?
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/10/22/796125/-Truth-or-Prank-Orlys-Star-Witness-Tells-All
Didn’t Dr. Taitz file a “judicial notice” after the October 5th hearing? From everything that I’ve been reading, it was standard practice for the Obama lawyers to file notice of the Kerchner v. Obama ruling with Judge Carter. It is also entirely legal and ethical for Judge Carter to review the decision and determine if any of the arguments weigh on his decisions regarding the Motion to Dismiss in Barnett v. Obama.
I love going to my granddaughter’s basketball games and I’m not very good at keeping quiet. It’s okay to “boo the ref” if he makes a bad call for our team but it’s ridiculous to do so when he’s making good calls and following the rules of the game.
Am I missing something here?