Sally Manor’s call for action
Sally Manor contributed a major set of advises and suggestions for those who want to get involved all the way. I combined it all in one article and urge everybody to followup on it. Thanks Sally.
- David Crockett
Cut Paste & Send to following:
HUGE STORY Supreme Court Justice Scalia Confirms He HASNT HEARD OF POTUS CHALLENGES
Wednesday, March 11, 2009 3:23 PM
netaudr@abc.com, nightline@abcnews.com, 2020@abc.com, evening@cbsnews.com, earlyshow@cbs.com, 48hours@cbsnews.com, ftn@cbsnews.com, 60minutes@cbsnews.com, info@cnbc.com, Special@foxnews.com, Foxreport@foxnews.com, Oreilly@foxnews.com, Hannity@foxnews.com, Colmes@foxnews.com, Ontherecord@foxnews.com, dateline@nbc.com, hardball@msnbc.com, joe@msnbc.com, nightly@nbc.com, today@nbc.com, newshour@pbs.org, ombudsman@npr.org, ElRushbo@eibnet.com, phil.boyce@citcomm.com, letters@latimes.com, readers.rep@latimes.com, letters@nytimes.com, news-tips@nytimes.com, senioreditor@nytimes.com, editor@usatoday.com, wsj.ltrs@wsj.com, wsjcontact@dowjones.com, letters@washpost.com, ombudsman@washpost.com, letters@newsweek.com, letters@time.com, letters@usnews.com, info@ap.org, tips@upi.com, fair@fair.org
Kindly refer to
http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/03/10/meeting-with-scalia-and-coordinated-cyber-attack.aspx
for the source documentation on the below
Synopsis:
This is the blog of a U.S. Supreme Court Approved Attorney to practice before it. She represents
Alan Keyes re: the “Natural Born Citizen ” Clause of the constitution. She also escaped communist Russia and is living in Southern California, passionate against the destruction of our sacred Constitution.
She had two interchanges with Supreme Court Justice Scalia this week in Los Angeles at his book release for a group of attorneys. Below are two emails comprised of requesting an answer from a high level Law Clerk at the Supreme Court and Attorney General Eric Holder.
Please follow thru–it is absolutely mind boggling that we had 4-5 COURT filings asking for the issue of the “Natural Born Citizen” clause to be heard/discussed amongst the Justices and then we have a Justice in public saying “Bring it–I’ll hear the case-I don’t know about the others” and that “I don’t remember, I don’t remember anything about that” when asked about the cases filed and denied. HE HAS NO RECOLLECTION OF THESE REQUESTS TO BE HEARD FROM U.S> CITIZENS AMONGST RECENT MULTIPLE FILINGS??
Clerk Bickle request for Confirmation
By Email To Supreme Court and Media Outlets
I believe I might be sending this to the incorrect email for Supreme Court Law Clerk Danny Bickle. Could you kindly forward this to him. THANK YOU
Clerk Bickle; It has come to the attention of a number of U.S. Citizens that you told Attorney Orly Taitz that her brief, which you refused to file with the court, would be returned to her, and that included with the return of the brief, would be a court authorized explanation as to why such brief was denied filing with the court. Attorney Taitz confirmed this also with Justice Scalia this week at a conference in Los Angeles for his book release whereupon conferring with Attorney Taitz re: filing a request for confirmation of presidential candidacy clause “Natural Born Citizen” from the constitution would simply need Four Justices to agree to hear the case. He then added that he had not heard of ANY OF THE FILINGS, the Berg, Donofrio, etc., that he “couldn’t remember” He then added to Taitz to “Bring the case, I’ll hear it” “I don’t know about others”.
Clerk Bickle, can you kindly explain why the Taitz’ brief has NOT been returned to her with an explanation, and if in fact you have documentation, any documentation to show that briefs that WERE accepted and filed with the court were at all reviewed, in this particular matter, by ANY of the Justices, will you kindly immediately submit such documentation to Attorney Taitz.
Thank you, I am following thru with this request in a copied format to media to get this resolved once and for all.
Second Mailing:.
With all due respect Attorney Holder: I do not know if you have actual oversight of the clerk level offices at the Supreme Court? But I am assuming as much, if not, just hit DELETE!!
An Attorney that has been accepted by the United States Supreme Court to practice before it, Attorney Orly Taitz, was told by Supreme Court Law Clerk Danny Bickle that her brief, which she attempted to file re: the presidency qualification clause of the U.S. Constitution, i.e. the “Natural Born Citizen” clause, would not be accepted or filed with the court.
He then went on to explain to her that he would “return the brief along with (a court authorized) explanation as to why the brief was not accepted” Bickle did not in fact return anything, or offer any sort of written explanation. He also at the time reconfirmed to Attorney Taitz that he knew full well “who she was” and how to get in contact with her.
ENTER JUSTICE SCALIA: Scalia this week in Los Angeles at a conference wherein he was releasing his book, accepted 3 attorneys to question him at the podium. Ms. Taitz was one of them. He then again conferred with Attorney Taitz thereafter at the end of a long drawn out book signing campaign.
The following exchange occurred:
She said, “I told Scalia that I was an attorney that filed Lightfoot v. Bowen that Chief Justice Roberts distributed for conference on Jan. 23 and now I represent nine state reps and 120 military officers, many of them high ranked, and I want to know if they will hear Quo Warranto and if they would hear it on original jurisdiction, if I bring Hawaii as an additional defendant to unseal the records and ascertain Obama’s legitimacy for presidency.”……
“Scalia stated that it would be heard if I can get four people to hear it. He repeated, you need four for the argument. I got a feeling that he was saying that one of these four that call themselves constitutionalists went to the other side,” Taitz said.
“He did not say that it is a political question, he did not say that it is for the legislature to decide. For example, right after me another attorney has asked him about his case of taxing some Internet commerce and right away Scalia told him that he should address it with the legislature. He did not say it to me. He did not say that Quo Warranto is antiquated or not appropriate. No, just get four,” she said.
She then bought Scalia’s book and waited in line to get it autographed.
“I gave him the books to sign and asked, ‘Tell me what to do, what can I do, those soldiers [her plaintiffs] can be court-martialed for asking a legitimate question, who is the president, is he legitimate.’
He (Justice Scalia) said, ‘Bring the case, I’ll hear it, I don’t know about others.’”
“I asked, tell me what happened before, why Lightfoot v Bowen was not heard, what about Berg, Wrotnownski, Donofrio”- he had a bewildered look on his face, he kept saying- “I don’t know, I don’t remember, I don’t know, I don’t remember.” Scalia seems to be one of the most decent judges on this court. I think he was telling the truth.
Could it be that the cases, were handled by those nefarious clerks, those “mahers”, that work for who knows who and the judges are clueless? I don’t know. At the end I gave him my 164 page dossier, that I’ve sent to Holder about all the suspected criminal activity, intimidation harrassment, cyber crime surrounding me and officer Easterling.
Scalia seemed to be interested and started reading the first page, he put it next to him, but then the secret service agent grabbed it. What could I do at theis point? Wrestle with the secret service? Clearly that wasn’t the time and the place to show of my black belt Tae kwon Do skills. I just shut up and left. There was nothing else I could do at that meeting
…. I remembered that I submitted quo Warranto as a supplemental brief to Roberts and the clerk Danny Bickle refused to docket it, saying “it is not what we do”. I asked for an explanation, I asked for him to call me and offered my number. He just laughed and said that he definitely knows my number, the whole Supreme Court does.
He promised to send the brief back with an explanation, as to why he didn’t docket it. I never got it back and I never got an explanation, I have no clue if Roberts ever saw the brief and of course it was never distributed to the rest of the judges.
Attorney Holder, if you do in fact hold jurisdiction over the Supreme Court Law Clerks, kindly;
1) Please advise what actions you have taken to look into this and to ascertain why Attorney Taitz has not had her brief returned to her with an official Court authorized explanation.
2) Please advise if there are in fact records or documentation within the court to ascertain that ANY of the “Natural Born Citizen” challenges have in fact been COMPLETELY distributed for review by any/all of the Justices.
3) Please advise if you hold no jurisdiction over these activities and if you know who exactly does.
CC: All Media Outlets
Part II
Cut N Paste and SEND TO MEDIA/HOLDER!!!
With all due respect Attorney Holder: I do not know if you have actual oversight of the clerk level offices at the Supreme Court? But I am assuming as much, if not, just hit DELETE!! An Attorney that has been accepted by the United States Supreme Court to practice before it, Attorney Orly Taitz, was told by Supreme Court Law Clerk Danny Bickle that her brief, which she attempted to file re: the presidency qualification clause of the U.S. Constitution, i.e. the “Natural Born Citizen” clause, would not be accepted or filed with the court. He then went on to explain to her that he would “return the brief along with (a court authorized) explanation as to why the brief was not accepted” Bickle did not in fact return anything, or offer any sort of written explanation. He also at the time reconfirmed to Attorney Taitz that he knew full well “who she was” and how to get in contact with her. ENTER JUSTICE SCALIA: Scalia this week in Los Angeles at a conference wherein he was releasing his book, accepted 3 attorneys to question him at the podium. Ms. Taitz was one of them. He then again conferred with Attorney Taitz thereafter at the end of a long drawn out book signing campaign. The following exchange occurred:
She said, “I told Scalia that I was an attorney that filed Lightfoot v. Bowen that Chief Justice Roberts distributed for conference on Jan. 23 and now I represent nine state reps and 120 military officers, many of them high ranked, and I want to know if they will hear Quo Warranto and if they would hear it on original jurisdiction, if I bring Hawaii as an additional defendant to unseal the records and ascertain Obama’s legitimacy for presidency.”……
“Scalia stated that it would be heard if I can get four people to hear it. He repeated, you need four for the argument. I got a feeling that he was saying that one of these four that call themselves constitutionalists went to the other side,” Taitz said.
“He did not say that it is a political question, he did not say that it is for the legislature to decide. For example, right after me another attorney has asked him about his case of taxing some Internet commerce and right away Scalia told him that he should address it with the legislature. He did not say it to me. He did not say that Quo Warranto is antiquated or not appropriate. No, just get four,” she said.
She then bought Scalia’s book and waited in line to get it autographed.
“I gave him the books to sign and asked, ‘Tell me what to do, what can I do, those soldiers [her plaintiffs] can be court-martialed for asking a legitimate question, who is the president, is he legitimate.’
He (Justice Scalia) said, ‘Bring the case, I’ll hear it, I don’t know about others.’”
“I asked, tell me what happened before, why Lightfoot v Bowen was not heard, what about Berg, Wrotnownski, Donofrio”- he had a bewildered look on his face, he kept saying- “I don’t know, I don’t remember, I don’t know, I don’t remember.” Scalia seems to be one of the most decent judges on this court. I think he was telling the truth.
Could it be that the cases, were handled by those nefarious clerks, those “mahers”, that work for who knows who and the judges are clueless? I don’t know. At the end I gave him my 164 page dossier, that I’ve sent to Holder about all the suspected criminal activity, intimidation harrassment, cyber crime surrounding me and officer Easterling.
Scalia seemed to be interested and started reading the first page, he put it next to him, but then the secret service agent grabbed it. What could I do at theis point? Wrestle with the secret service? Clearly that wasn’t the time and the place to show of my black belt Tae kwon Do skills. I just shut up and left. There was nothing else I could do at that meeting
…. I remembered that I submitted quo Warranto as a supplemental brief to Roberts and the clerk Danny Bickle refused to docket it, saying “it is not what we do”. I asked for an explanation, I asked for him to call me and offered my number. He just laughed and said that he definitely knows my number, the whole Supreme Court does. He promised to send the brief back with an explanation, as to why he didn’t docket it. I never got it back and I never got an explanation, I have no clue if Roberts ever saw the brief and of course it was never distributed to the rest of the judges.
Attorney Holder, if you do in fact hold jurisdiction over the Supreme Court Law Clerks, kindly;
1) Please advise what actions you have taken to look into this and to ascertain why Attorney Taitz has not had her brief returned to her with an official Court authorized explanation.
2) Please advise if there are in fact records or documentation within the court to ascertain that ANY of the “Natural Born Citizen” challenges have in fact been COMPLETELY distributed for review by any/all of the Justices.
3) Please advise if you hold no jurisdiction over these activities and if you know who exactly does.
CC: All Media Outlets
Part III
Clerk Bickle request for Confirmation
By Email To Supreme Court and Media Outlets
I believe I might be sending this to the incorrect email for Supreme Court Law Clerk Danny Bickle. Could you kindly forward this to him. THANK YOU 
Clerk Bickle; It has come to the attention of a number of U.S. Citizens that you told Attorney Orly Taitz that her brief, which you refused to file with the court, would be returned to her, and that included with the return of the brief, would be a court authorized explanation as to why such brief was denied filing with the court. Attorney Taitz confirmed this also with Justice Scalia this week at a conference in Los Angeles for his book release whereupon conferring with Attorney Taitz re: filing a request for confirmation of presidential candidacy clause “Natural Born Citizen” from the constitution would simply need Four Justices to agree to hear the case. He then added that he had not heard of ANY OF THE FILINGS, the Berg, Donofrio, etc., that he “couldn’t remember” He then added to Taitz to “Bring the case, I’ll hear it” “I don’t know about others”. Clerk Bickle, can you kindly explain why the Taitz’ brief has NOT been returned to her with an explanation, and if in fact you have documentation, any documentation to show that briefs that WERE accepted and filed with the court were at all reviewed, in this particular matter, by ANY of the Justices, will you kindly immediately submit such documentation to Attorney Taitz. Thank you, I am following thru with this request in a copied format to media to get this resolved once and for all.
I find it very difficult, if not impossible, to believe Justice Scalia has not heard of the efforts to ascertain the truth about Obama’s eligibility. I read his reply differently from others - when he said he didn’t “know about the others” I interpreted that to mean he would hear the case, and the “others” he was referring to were the other Justices, meaning he didn’t know if they would hear the case. I may be way off base here (I hope I am) but for him to say he hasn’t heard about or doesn’t remember this case is very hard to believe. Does he live and work in a sealed box? Has anyone considered that Obama or his cronies have some damning information about at least one of the Justices that will keep this case from ever being heard. But I sincerely hope this is a matter of sabotage by Danny Bickle, that he has now been exposed, and this case will finally get the attention it deserves from the people who can resolve it.
No, I Agree, I interpreted his comment “about the others” to refer to the other justices as well, He was saying “Bring it (a new filing)on” basically, that he would be interested in hearing it, but that she would need 4 to agree to hear it
when he says “I don’t remember”…we will never know the degree of Bickle or otherwise involvement in that comment, or if he is just saying that to appease her, or if he truly doesn’t know! But obviously, he must know something, because wasn’t everything filtered thru Roberts first? I know my mother personally sent certified letters to each individual justice asking them to hear the case back in early January
Strange that just about all in South Africa have followed this case and spoken of it yet clerk Bickle an American citizen claims he knows nothing about it.
Sounds similar to the legal strains South Africans have recently undergone.
GOD SAVE AMERICA! LET’S ROLL! TODAY!
* Posted by Trooper on May 4, 2009 at 4:49pm
* Send Message View Trooper’s blog
LET’S ROLL TO THE WASHINGTON MONUMENT AND PROTEST THIS PRESIDENT AND HIS POLICIES TO DESTROY ALL OF AMERICA!
WE SHALL GO AND PRAY FOR MERCY AND ASK GOD TO SAVE AMERICA.
Photo 1997 Promise Keepers
LET’S ROLL TO WASHINGTON’S MONUMENT AND SET THE RECORD FOR PEOPLE PROTESTING ON THE MALL!! THE LARGEST RECORDED CROWD WAS ABOUT 1.2 MILLION PEOPLE, AND IT WAS NOT FOR OBAMA’S INAUGURATION!!
LET’S ROLL WHILE WE STILL CAN TO PROTEST EVERYTHING TODAY! WE CAN ALL DRIVE TO THE LOCATION AND STAY AS LONG AS POSSIBLE OR UNTIL HE IS REMOVED!
COME AND PROTEST ANY AND ALL THINGS; FROM MISSING BIRTH CERTIFICATE, TO ERASED FREEDOMS, AND FINALLY, TO STOP OBAMA FROM RIPPING OUR CONSTITUTION INTO PIECES!!!
GOD SAVE AMERICA! WE CAN HAVE A NON-STOP PRAYER VIGIL FOR WEEKS UPON WEEKS!
AND GO SEE ALL THE BIBLE VERSES CARVED INTO OUR MONUMENTS EVERYWHERE. I THINK IT MIGHT MEAN WE ARE A CHRISTIAN NATION? IF YOU CANNOT GO, THEN PRAY WITH ALL YOUR HEART, RIGHT WHERE YOU ARE.
CARS AND TRUCKS AND FAMILIES COMING AND GOING FOR WEEKS OF ONGOING PROTEST! DECORATE YOUR CARS AND TRUCKS; PROTEST ANYTHING YOU WANT ABOUT WHAT IS BECOMING RAW TYRANNY!
I BRING NO GUN. GOD AND ONE TRUE WITNESS IS A MAJORITY.
WE MUST PRAY FOR FORGIVENESS AND REPENT; AND CRY OUT FOR MERCY AND GRACE; THAT GOD WILL SAVE US AND AMERICA. WHEREVER YOU MIGHT BE, YOU CAN PRAY AND SEEK FORGIVENESS AND BE SAVED. WHEN FEAR GRIPS YOUR HEART, THEN CRY OUT TO THE LORD AND BE SAVED. GOD HEAR OUR PRAYERS AND SAVE US AND OUR CHILDREN AND OUR NATION, IN THE NAME OF JESUS CHRIST, AMEN.
OBAMA HAS LIED TO US! HE IS AN INELIGIBLE FOREIGNER!!