Why are there still questions about qualifications?
Arguments of president’s defenders never actually addressed eligibility
By Bob Unruh
In the last few months, dozens of U.S. courts have dismissed legal challenges to Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, and even the U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hold a hearing on the evidence – but what have the courts actually cited as reasons for dismissing the concerns of millions of Americans?
Mootness, lack of jurisdiction, lack of responsibility, lack of standing, a series of “no comments” and even the fact the issue has been “twittered.”
Thank you Joseph Farah for documenting this historic day!
A California attorney battling on a number of fronts to obtain documentation of Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president is asking the FBI and U.S. Secret Service to investigate suspected “tampering” at the U.S. Supreme Court.
Dear Judiciary Committee Member:
Fellow Americans,