The Betrayal

Natural Born Citizen - A Place to Ask Questions and Get the Right Answers published

Ad - Obama Ineligible! 21 Feb 2011 issue Washington Times National Weekly edition - page 5.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/49213761/Obama-Ineligible-21-Feb-2011-Washington-Times-National-Weekly-edition-pg-5

Citizen maybe, but NOT a “natural born Citizen” of the United States.

Obama is not Article II constitutionally eligible to be the President and Commander of our military. Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen” to constitutional standards. Obama’s father was NOT a U.S. Citizen. Obama’s father was not an immigrant to the United States. Obama’s father was a foreign national, a British Subject. Obama is the child of an alien father who was sojourning in the U.S. attending college. Obama was born a British Subject via his father and is still such to this day. Obama has never conclusively proved he was born in Hawaii. Obama’s paternal family in Kenya, Kenyan government officials, and newspapers in Kenya say he was born in Kenya. Obama’s maternal grandmother likely falsely and illegally registered him as born in Hawaii to get him, her new foreign-born grandson, U.S. Citizenship.
[Read more →]

Tags: Eligibility Crisis, Mario Apuzzo, eligibility by David-Crockett
7 Comments »

CONSTITUENT EDUCATES SENATOR ON THE MEANING OF “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN”

February 9, 2011

Senator Roy Blunt
Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C.  20510

Dear Senator Blunt:

I am grateful for your reply to my letter of January 7 regarding eligibility requirements, but I am disappointed in your response for several reasons.

1.  You must be an honorable man, but you completely ignored the fact that at the time of his birth, Barack H. Obama II owed allegiance to Great Britain. That is not disputed, it is admitted by Obama himself.  Thus you failed to respond to the central point of my letter:  because Obama’s father was a foreigner, Obama II is not a “natural born Citizen” (nbC), regardless of where he was born, and is therefore ineligible for the presidency.  I pointed out that nbC is different from plain citizen, but you write as if the only question is whether Obama was born in Hawaii.  It is impossible for someone born with foreign allegiance to be nbC.

[Read more →]

Tags: Eligibility Crisis, eligibility by David-Crockett
3 Comments »

Video: Funny how it is no problem when a flaming Liberal can ask Robert Gibbs a “birther” question without being ridiculed for it. I guess when Sarah Palin’s name is involved then all is good. Just days ago WND’s White House correspondent was practically laughed out of the room when he asked a simple question regarding the 10+ states seeking proof of constitutional eligibility from presidential candidates. Have they no shame!? Video below transcript. Previous reports on Obama’s propagandist can be found here, here, here, here and here.
[Read more →]

Tags: Eligibility Crisis, eligibility by David-Crockett
No Comments »

Lawmaker files new bill to require presidential candidates be qualified
© 2011 WorldNetDaily

WASHINGTON – And then there were 11.

The push at the state level to ensure no future president enters office under the cloud of suspicion that he or she might not be constitutionally eligible is growing.

At the request of a local tea-party group, Tennessee state Sen. Mae Beavers has filed a bill that would require presidential candidates to show an original birth certificate establishing constitutional eligibility for the office before getting on the ballot beginning in 2012.

[Read more →]

Tags: Eligibility Crisis, eligibility by David-Crockett
2 Comments »

The Right Side Of Life published

Blogger “Ulsterman” has posted another alleged communication from the same former White House insider, this time claiming to detail that conversations are going on related to the eligibility issue. In short, as one commenter — “MJ” — to the posting said, “Birthers [are] living rent free in Obama’s head:”

…Second focus was apparently “birther” related.  Jarrett expressed concern over possible newly passed eligibility requirements in states.  If only one or two states clarify eligibility in order to run for office, White House will simply use those states as examples of “anti-Obama racism”.  They would likely not win the electorals in those states regardless, but could use the scenario to gain sympathy and support over the challenge from other moderate states.  This is the tactic Jarrett and crew have prepared.  She is worried though that if more than one or two states challenge the president’s eligibility, the issue would turn against them.  Measures are being taken to make certain that does not happen.  What those measures are, I don’t know at this point.  Oh, and while discussion over eligibility was underway, Obama sat motionless.  He said nothing.  That strikes me as pretty damn odd don’t you think?  People are discussing whether or not you are actually eligible to run for re-election in 2012 and you don’t say a word on the subject?  “He just sat there with a weird little smile and didn’t say anything.”  Go ahead and print that quote word for word.  Others are now willing to let their observations be more known.  Concern for the country is now winning over concern for their own political interests.  Finally.

Commenter “Christina” helped Ms. Jarrett out a little bit by providing a current listing of States considering eligibility measures:

[Read more →]

Tags: Eligibility Crisis, eligibility by David-Crockett
1 Comment »

The first comment below is from a “conservative commenter” at one of my ORYR Facebook groups.  The comment is typical misinformation of what you see posted by the paid Obots across the web.  The second comment is a rebuttal courtesy of Attorney Mario Apuzzo.

The misinformation that is being spread needs to be flushed out with facts.  The Obots, and the misinformed, never leave any links to back their claims up.  When you respond with facts they just attack and run.

[Read more →]

Tags: Eligibility Crisis, Mario Apuzzo, eligibility, general by David-Crockett
2 Comments »

Also read DC Knows that Obama is Ineligible for Office

DEMOCRAT SENATOR PATRICK LEAHY AND OTHERS “RESOLVED” THAT IT TOOK TWO CITIZEN PARENTS TO BE A “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN”
by Tim DeJong

(May 17, 2010) —  The simple truth in evidence is Obama’s own declaration that he was born of a British father and is therefore not a “natural born Citizen.”

The Constitution is a modest document. Much of its meaning is in what is usually called common law. Some assume common law refers to Blackstone or English Common Law. The framers and many justices, Joseph Story among them, have referred to Vattel as our common law. Given that the first school of law established at a college in the Congress United (between the Revolution and the ratification) was that created at William and Mary by Thomas Jefferson, when James Madison was its president, and among its first students was John Marshall, and the stated structure of the curriculum was Law of Nations based upon Vattel and Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations. Can there be any doubt about the intent of the framers when justices including subsequent Chief Justice John Marshall cited Vattel when quoting “born on the soil of parents who are its citizens?” When the principal author of the 14th amendment, John Bingham, cites Vattel “about which there has never been doubt,” the meaning of “natural born Citizen” is confirmed for at least the twentieth time.

[Read more →]

Tags: Constitutional Backgrounders, DC Knows Obama Doesn't Qualify, Eligibility Crisis, eligibility, general by David-Crockett
1 Comment »

Ineligible candidate would be ‘biggest scam ever perpetuated on American people’
By Bob Unruh

The chief elections officer in the state of South Dakota says the issue of President Obama’s eligibility to the office is a huge concern among the voters in that state, and he thinks the constitutional qualifications for the office are supremely important to the nation.

“I would hope that all Americans would find constitutional qualifications to be an important issue,” Chris Nelson told WND today. “I would hope there would not be any questions about the issue.”

The comments came after Nelson was quoted in a Rapid City newspaper article that poked fun at the issue.

Under the headline, “OK, who doesn’t think he was born in Hawaii?” the newspaper said, “Raise your hand, roll your eyes and sigh softly if you do.”

[Read more →]

Tags: Eligibility Crisis, eligibility by David-Crockett
10 Comments »

Were ANY of the Founding Fathers “natural born citizens” of the United States?

No… they were not. Not even one of the Founding Fathers was a “natural born citizen” of the United States of America, even though some of them had indeed been (native) born on what would become U.S. soil.

None of them were “natural born citizens” because all of the Founding Fathers were born prior to the existence of the United States of America. No one could be the “natural born citizen” of a nation that did not yet exist.

[Read more →]

Tags: Eligibility Crisis, eligibility by David-Crockett
13 Comments »

Talk-radio icon suggests prez ‘touchy on the subject of producing your papers’
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

The website Media Matters is highlighting a comment from talk radio icon Rush Limbaugh in which he explains he can understand President Barack Obama’s sensitivity to a state requirement for documentation of citizenship.

“Maybe he’s afraid somebody’s going to ask him for his,” stated Limbaugh on his program Wednesday.

[Read more →]

Tags: Eligibility Crisis, eligibility by David-Crockett
1 Comment »

NorthEast Intelligence Network

By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

27 April 2010: I cannot think of any other subject in recent American history that has been so mired in controversy, so factually misrepresented, mischaracterized and so misunderstood than the matter of the eligibility of Barack Hussein OBAMA II to hold the office of President of the United States. Despite its importance, the topic has been summarily dismissed as fodder for conspiracy theorists by many, while others insist that the question of OBAMA’s citizenship has been “asked and answered.” But has it really been answered, and if not, why not?

[Read more →]

Tags: Eligibility Crisis, eligibility by David-Crockett
1 Comment »

THE PEACH STATE FOLLOWS ARIZONA’S LEAD IN REQUIRING ELIGIBILITY PROOF FOR PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES
by Kathleen Gotto

(Apr. 24, 2010) — Georgia Representative Mark Hatfield has introduced into the state legislature House Bill 1516, which  would require proof of eligibility in order for presidential candidates’ names to be placed on the state ballot for future elections.

WorldNetDaily reports that Hatfield represents a coalition within the Georgia legislature which is prepared to take action on the issue, because “without the leadership in Washington necessary to do that, it is up to states to tackle the issue.”  Georgia follows Arizona, which has proposed its own eligibility bill. That proposal has now passed the Arizona House 31-29 and is now in the Senate awaiting action.

[Read more →]

Tags: Eligibility Crisis, Georgia, Mario Apuzzo, eligibility by David-Crockett
No Comments »

THREE-TERM MAYOR: “I DON’T THINK HE’S AN AMERICAN, PERSONALLY”
by Sharon Rondeau

(Apr. 17, 2010) — An elected official in the state where Obama served in the senate and the U.S. Senate has gone on the record stating that he has doubts about Obama’s citizenship.

The statement was made at a tea party event and reported mainly by The Associated Press. The mayor, Jerry Schweighart, was asked by a cameraman what he thought of Obama, and Schweighart answered, “You know, if you’re not willing to produce an original certificate like a birth certificate, then you’ve got something to hide.”

[Read more →]

Tags: Eligibility Crisis, Illinois, eligibility by David-Crockett
5 Comments »

WHEN WILL THEY LIVE UP TO THEIR MOTTO?
from a Concerned Citizen

(Apr. 13, 2010) — The following letter was sent today to the writer’s local FBI office:

Dear Sir,

I am a retired federal contracting officer and would like to know why the FBI is not involved in investigating the constitutional ineligibility of Barack Obama to serve as a de jure president? Just recently, on March 25, 2010, during debate over the draft of a new Kenyan constitution, James Orengo, the country’s minister of lands and a member of parliament for the Ugenya constituency, cited America’s election of a Kenyan-born president as an example of what can be accomplished when diverse peoples unite:

If America was living in a situation where they feared ethnicity and did not see itself as a multiparty state or nation, how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the president of America?

You can find this news here and here.

[Read more →]

Tags: Eligibility Crisis, eligibility, general by David-Crockett
3 Comments »

Since 2008, an ongoing controversy has raged as to whether President Barack Obama was actually born in Hawaii as claimed. Barack Obama has rejected all demands for the public release of his original Hawaiian birth certificate, which would presumably include the actual hospital that performed the delivery and the name of the attending physician at the birth.

The U.S. Constitution requires that no one can be sworn into office as President of the United States without being a “natural born” citizen.

Article. II. Section 1: “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

[Read more →]

Tags: Eligibility Crisis, eligibility by David-Crockett
4 Comments »